Skip to main content

EValuating trEatment RESponses of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Type 2 Patients

Completed · Phase 4 · NCT04998604

Conditions: Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Asthma

At a glance

Research payments reported, 2025
$219,506
U.S. investigators named
10
Sites paid
10
Planned or actual enrollment
360

About the trial

Sponsor
Sanofi (with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals)
Tested
Dupilumab (drug), Omalizumab (drug), Placebo (drug)
Dates
Started 2021-09-27; completion 2024-12-27
Results posted
Yes

Primary Objective -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell Secondary Objectives * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSw…

From ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-23. Full record, eligibility and contacts (opens in a new tab)

Industry funding

Genzyme Corporation reported $219,506 in research payments for this study in 2025 (31 payments).

Products named: Dupixent

Research payments usually go to hospitals, universities and research sites to run a study, not to the investigators personally. A payment is not evidence of wrongdoing.

U.S. investigators named on this study

Clinicians the company named as principal investigators in its Open Payments reports.

Sites paid to run it

Sources: CMS Open Payments research payments (program year 2025) and ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine.